Learn how to calculate and interpret key fixed-income measures, including bond yields, price sensitivity, duration, and present value.
This section covers the analytical side of fixed income. For RSE purposes, students must be able not only to calculate yields, duration, and present value, but also to explain what those results mean for client risk, pricing, and recommendation quality. A correct number without correct interpretation is usually not enough.
Fixed-income calculations often test a chain of reasoning. Students may need to identify whether a bond is trading at a premium or discount, determine which yield measure is relevant, estimate how price may respond to rate changes, and explain why the answer matters for a client’s horizon or risk tolerance. The strongest answer therefore combines arithmetic and judgment.
The curriculum expects students to calculate and interpret current yield, approximate yield to maturity, and zero-coupon yield.
Current yield compares the annual coupon to the current market price.
Here, \( C \) is the annual coupon payment and \( P \) is the current bond price.
Current yield is useful because it quickly shows the coupon income being earned relative to price paid. However, it does not capture the capital gain or loss from the bond moving toward par at maturity.
Approximate yield to maturity adds the annualized pull-to-par effect to coupon income and then compares that combined amount with the average of price and par.
Here, \( F \) is face value and \( n \) is years to maturity.
Approximate YTM is stronger than current yield because it captures both:
It is still an approximation, not a full internal-rate-of-return calculation, but it is often exactly what the exam expects.
A zero-coupon bond has no interim coupon. Its return comes from the difference between purchase price and maturity value.
The exam point is simple: with a strip or other zero-coupon instrument, there is no current coupon income, so yield is entirely a function of discount and maturity value.
Students should connect yield measures to where the bond trades relative to par.
This matters because:
A common exam trap is to confuse coupon with total expected return. Coupon is only one part of the result.
The curriculum also expects students to interpret yield curves at a high level.
A normal upward-sloping curve generally suggests higher yields for longer maturities. A flat curve suggests little extra yield for extending maturity. An inverted curve means shorter maturities yield more than longer maturities.
At an exam level, students should connect these shapes to broad expectations:
These are informed interpretations, not guarantees.
A curve can also change shape over time.
Students should describe the likely implication for maturity exposure and interest-rate risk without claiming certainty about future macro outcomes.
This part of the curriculum is easier to remember when the student can see the three recurring visuals behind the formulas.
The figure is not a substitute for the calculations. It is a memory aid for the ideas students must connect quickly: price relative to par changes yield interpretation, the curve sets the maturity context, and duration explains why the same rate move can produce different price effects.
Bond prices move inversely to yields. If yields rise, bond prices tend to fall. If yields fall, bond prices tend to rise.
The magnitude of that price change depends on several factors, including:
At a high level:
That is why a long strip is usually much more volatile than a short, high-coupon bond.
The curriculum expects students to distinguish Macaulay duration from modified duration.
Macaulay duration measures the weighted average timing of the bond’s cash flows. It is a timing measure.
For interpretation purposes:
Modified duration adapts the Macaulay concept into a price-sensitivity measure.
Here, \( y \) is the relevant yield expressed for the same compounding basis used in the duration setup.
The important conceptual distinction is:
Students should not use the two terms as if they are interchangeable.
Once modified duration is known, it can be used to approximate the percentage price change for a small yield movement.
This formula implies:
For example, if modified duration is 5 and yields rise by 1%, the estimated price change is about:
That is about a 5% price decline.
Students should explain the sign correctly. A frequent exam error is getting the direction backward.
A fixed-income security is worth the present value of its future cash flows discounted at the required rate of return.
Here:
For a standard coupon bond, those cash flows usually include:
If the discount rate rises, the present value of those cash flows falls. That is the basic economic reason bond prices decline when required yields rise.
When a calculation question appears, a useful sequence is:
This helps avoid the common mistake of using a correct formula for the wrong question.
A representative is reviewing two bonds for a client who may need to sell within three years if business capital is required. Bond X is a long-term strip trading at a discount. Bond Y is a shorter-term coupon bond with a lower duration. The representative tells the client that Bond X is preferable because its current yield appears higher and because all fixed-income securities become safer when purchased below par. The representative also estimates that if yields rise by 1%, Bond X will gain value because discount bonds move toward par.
What is the strongest assessment?
Correct answer: D.
Explanation: The scenario combines several analytical mistakes. Current yield does not capture the full return profile, especially for a strip. A long strip usually has very high duration and therefore substantial price sensitivity to interest-rate changes. If yields rise, price generally falls, even though the bond would still move toward par over time if held to maturity. For a client with a possible sale need in three years, the shorter-duration bond may be easier to defend.