CIRO Supervisor Exam study plan with 30-, 60-, and 90-day tracks, weekly sequencing, and final-review priorities.
On this page
Use this page to turn CIRO Supervisor Exam into a repeatable control-review process instead of a loose reading project. Pair the timing blocks below with the Supervisor guide, the Cheat Sheet, FAQ, Resources, and web practice.
Before you start
Treat this as an ownership exam. Many questions are really asking what should have been approved, reviewed, escalated, or restricted sooner.
Keep one running note sheet for account approvals, account activity, Approved Persons, and communications because the fact patterns often cross those lines.
Start timed work only after you can say which control came first, who owned it, and what evidence the supervisor should review.
30-day intensive track
Week 1: General regulatory framework; Supervisory structure: Investment Dealer responsibilities; Specific supervision responsibilities for business and operations
Week 2: Specific supervision responsibilities for account approvals; Specific supervision responsibilities for account activity; Specific supervision responsibilities for Approved Persons
Week 3: Specific supervision responsibilities for trading and market rules; Specific supervision responsibilities for advertisements, sales literature and communications and research; Risks associated with Investment Dealer activity and registered locations
Week 4: run mixed timed sets, review every miss, and re-drill the 2-3 topics that still produce hesitation.
60-day balanced track
Weeks 1-2: General regulatory framework; Supervisory structure: Investment Dealer responsibilities; Specific supervision responsibilities for business and operations
Weeks 3-4: Specific supervision responsibilities for account approvals; Specific supervision responsibilities for account activity
Weeks 5-6: Specific supervision responsibilities for Approved Persons; Specific supervision responsibilities for trading and market rules
Weeks 7-8: Specific supervision responsibilities for advertisements, sales literature and communications and research; Risks associated with Investment Dealer activity and registered locations
90-day part-time track
Weeks 1-2: General regulatory framework; Supervisory structure: Investment Dealer responsibilities
Weeks 3-4: Specific supervision responsibilities for business and operations; Specific supervision responsibilities for account approvals
Weeks 5-6: Specific supervision responsibilities for account activity; Specific supervision responsibilities for Approved Persons
Weeks 7-8: Specific supervision responsibilities for trading and market rules
Weeks 9-10: Specific supervision responsibilities for advertisements, sales literature and communications and research
Weeks 11-12: Risks associated with Investment Dealer activity and registered locations
Across the final two weeks: slow down, clean up note cards and rule sheets, then finish with timed mixed review rather than new content.
Weekly execution pattern
Day
Focus
Day 1
Read one domain for structure: what the supervisor is expected to approve, review, restrict, or monitor.
Day 2
Build distinction notes: pre-approval vs post-review, supervisor vs compliance, branch-level issue vs firm-wide issue.
Day 3
Work short scenario sets and tag misses by control type: onboarding, activity review, communication review, market-rule oversight, or escalation.
Day 4
Add the adjacent domain that commonly appears with it, such as account approvals plus account activity or communications plus branch risk.
Day 5
Run a timed mini-set and check whether you are finding the first missed control step rather than the last visible symptom.
Day 6
Rewrite weak scenarios into one-line control rules: what should have happened, when, and who should own it.
Day 7
Light review only, then choose the next study block from the weakest control family rather than the newest topic.
What stronger review looks like
Tag misses by why they failed: wrong owner, wrong timing, wrong evidence, or wrong escalation level.
Review account-activity questions by asking what should have been noticed earlier at account opening or periodic review.
Treat Approved Person issues as supervision-system questions, not just conduct questions.
When communications or research appear, ask who had approval or retention responsibility before looking for the content mistake.