Series 161 Cheat Sheet — High-Yield Concepts & Decision Traps

Series 161 is “research communications review.” Most questions ask what the supervisory analyst should approve, revise, restrict, document, or coordinate.

Quick links:

• Guide Home
• FAQ
• Official Resources

Series 161 at a glance

• Items (reference): 50
• Time (reference): 90 minutes
• Pace target: ~1:48 per question

Exam map

• Review and Approve Research Analysts’ Communications — 68%
• Serve as Liaison Between Research and Other Parties — 32%

Best-answer checklist

1. What communication is being reviewed?
2. What disclosure, approval, or consistency issue is really at stake?
3. Is this a content-review problem or a liaison/boundary problem?
4. What should the supervisory analyst approve, revise, or escalate?

Common traps

• treating it like a content-authoring exam instead of an approval exam
• focusing on investment merit while missing disclosure or presentation issues
• underestimating liaison and boundary-management questions
• choosing a commercially convenient answer over the cleaner supervisory one