Browse FINRA SIE & Series Exam Guides

Series 28 Allowable Assets, Non-Allowable Assets, Receivable Aging, and Collateralization (3.3) Guide

Study allowable assets, non-allowable assets, receivable aging, and collateralization (3.3) for the FINRA Series 28 Introducing Broker-Dealer FINOP exam with learning objectives, control logic, and exam traps.

This Series 28 lesson covers allowable assets, non-allowable assets, receivable aging, and collateralization (3.3) within Net Capital. Read it as an introducing broker-dealer FINOP control lesson: the exam usually asks what must be classified, reconciled, filed, preserved, restricted, or escalated so the firm stays inside its financial and operational limits.

Learning Objectives

  • Distinguish allowable assets from non-allowable assets in an introducing broker-dealer trial balance.
  • Explain why assets not readily convertible into cash receive non-allowable or deduction treatment.
  • Assess whether a receivable should be aged, collateralized, deducted, or treated as non-allowable.
  • Identify when an asset appears liquid in form but remains non-allowable because collectability or convertibility is weak.
  • Evaluate whether collateral support changes the treatment of a receivable under the stated facts.
  • Use a trial-balance excerpt to identify which line item most clearly creates an allowable-versus-non-allowable issue.
  • Determine the capital implication when an aged receivable is left in an allowable-asset category without support.
  • Select the best remediation when unsupported asset balances are overstating net capital or masking operational deficiencies.
  • Determine when a bank deposit, prepaid item, exchange membership, or other asset should be treated as non-allowable under the stated facts.

Key Concepts

  • Classification comes before arithmetic in Series 28 capital questions.
  • Introducing-firm status matters, but it does not remove the need for conservative capital treatment.
  • A final net capital result can trigger restrictions, notices, approvals, or business-curtailment decisions.

Exam Focus

This section is most likely to test classification, deductions, thresholds, haircuts, allowable assets, liabilities, and the consequence of the final capital position. Strong answers identify the control question before choosing the filing, recordkeeping, calculation, or operational response. Weak answers often sound plausible because they use familiar broker-dealer vocabulary while skipping the introducing-firm boundary or the evidence that a FINOP should require.

Series 28 is especially unforgiving when a candidate treats the topic as ordinary back-office administration. The exam expects principal-level judgment: what must be reviewed, what must be supportable, what must be retained, and what must be escalated when the facts stop being routine.

How to Apply This Section

Start by identifying the broker-dealer status and the method or threshold being tested. Then classify each asset, liability, receivable, deduction, haircut, or support arrangement before performing any calculation. If the result weakens capital, ask what restriction, notice, approval, or escalation follows.

Use this sequence when a question feels dense:

StepQuestionWhy it matters
Classify the issueIs this reporting, operations, capital, customer protection, funding, or records?It keeps the answer inside the tested function.
Identify the firm boundaryWhat changes because this is an introducing broker-dealer?It prevents importing the wrong carrying-firm answer.
Find the evidenceWhat filing, ledger, reconciliation, record, notice, or approval should exist?Series 28 rewards defensible controls.
Choose the FINOP responseShould the firm calculate, correct, preserve, restrict, notify, or escalate?It turns technical facts into principal action.

Decision Table

If the stem includes…First concernStronger answer pattern
unsupported balance, mismatch, or stale itemreliabilityreconcile, classify, support, and document
unclear responsibility between firmsboundarycheck the introducing and clearing allocation
late, missing, or inconsistent recordbooks and recordspreserve or reconstruct evidence and fix the control
capital, funding, or margin pressurefinancial conditionclassify conservatively and escalate restrictions or notices
unusual, material, or prohibited activitysupervisionstop informal handling and follow the documented escalation process

Common Pitfalls

  • Doing math before deciding whether the item belongs in the calculation.
  • Treating a valuable business asset as allowable without checking capital treatment.
  • Stopping at the number and missing the required FINOP response.

Review Checklist

Before leaving this section, make sure you can address these points:

  • Distinguish allowable assets from non-allowable assets in an introducing broker-dealer trial balance.
  • Explain why assets not readily convertible into cash receive non-allowable or deduction treatment.
  • Assess whether a receivable should be aged, collateralized, deducted, or treated as non-allowable.
  • Identify when an asset appears liquid in form but remains non-allowable because collectability or convertibility is weak.
  • Evaluate whether collateral support changes the treatment of a receivable under the stated facts.
  • Use a trial-balance excerpt to identify which line item most clearly creates an allowable-versus-non-allowable issue.
  • Determine the capital implication when an aged receivable is left in an allowable-asset category without support.
  • Select the best remediation when unsupported asset balances are overstating net capital or masking operational deficiencies.
  • Explain how the introducing broker-dealer boundary affects the answer.
  • State what evidence a FINOP should expect to review or preserve.

Key Takeaways

  • Series 28 questions usually test control judgment more than isolated definition recall.
  • The best answer normally classifies the issue, checks the firm boundary, and chooses a documented FINOP response.
  • Reporting, operations, capital, customer protection, and records topics often overlap in the fact pattern.
  • When facts are incomplete or financially stressful, conservative classification and timely escalation are usually safer than informal handling.
Revised on Friday, May 29, 2026